Oracle SQL Developer’s Laziness

Come on, Oracle. Is it that hard to scan a directory to look for one of your own products?

Oracle SQL Developer first-run screen asking for path to JDK

The path I gave it was “C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_152”.

Was that so hard? If you’d like some help in looping through a directory, give me a call.

This is why Java gets such a poor reputation with some people. Its developers are just bone idle and couldn’t be bothered to take care of something so fundamentally basic.

Java could be so much better than this.

MP3 Track Order Nightmares on MZD Connect

I have a 2015 Mazda 3 SP-25 which has been driving me nuts for some time now. Apart from its frequent habit of forgetting which track I was listening to whenever I start the car, it has been playing tracks in the wrong order this past year. I’ve only just now finally figured out why it’s playing tracks out of sequence.

The TL;DR (too long, didn’t read) summary is basically this: macOS somehow copies files to FAT32 volumes that won’t be listed in the correct order on other operating systems. This must have been a regression in recent macOS versions because I don’t recall having this problem a few years ago.

Here’s an example of an album that was copied to a FAT32 volume on macOS 10.13 “High Sierra”:

DOS window showing files in the wrong order

By using the command “dir /x” you can see the “8.3” compatible filenames listed as well, and you can see they are apparently fine, yet the files are not shown in the correct order.

If you copy this folder using a Windows 10 computer to the Desktop, delete it from the USB stick, then copy them back to the same USB stick, the files will be shown in the correct order:

DOS window showing files in the correct order

Here’s what the album copied by a Mac looks like in the Mazda’s MZD Connect entertainment system:

MZD Connect screen showing files in the wrong order

And here’s what the album copied by Windows looks like:

MZD Connect screen showing files in the correct order

I initially suspected randomly generated backwards compatible “8.3” filenames as the culprit, but they seem fine, so just how the files are not showing or being played in the correct order is still a bit of a mystery. The blame is mostly attributable to Apple for somehow writing files to FAT32 volumes in such a way that they are not read in the correct order. It would be nice, though, if Mazda could sort the file names alphabetically when MZD Connect reads the directory listing instead of just trusting what it gets from the file system.

So, at least I now have a solution to this constant source of irritation -i.e., copy all the files off the USB Stick using Windows and copy them all back again. At least Windows can be trusted to write files to a file allocation table that Microsoft (and others) invented. Apple obviously doesn’t give a toss, and unordered filenames is the penalty we must pay for flirting with a foreign disk format, sadly.

One thing is for sure, if/when I buy a new car, I will be making sure the entertainment system knows how to play tracks in the correct order. I’ll create two folders, one copied on the Mac and the other on Windows. Bonus points for any car which can sort filenames alphabetically/numerically in the dodgy Mac folder. Extra bonus points for any car whose entertainment system doesn’t forget which track number I’m up to when I turn off the car.

Oh, and my next car has to either come with no i-stop feature or have a master switch – that I only have to press once – to disable it! I’m so sick of my Mazda turning off the engine when I put the foot on the brakes! It might be a handy thing to have on all the time if you lived in a large city with traffic jams all the time, but not where I live.

The Web is a great, big, polished turd

Web development isn’t fun anymore. It used to be that you picked a server-side language, typed up some human-readable HTML, sprinkled it with a little bit of JavaScript to improve the user experience, and your job was done. These days it has become an all-you-can-eat buffet of overlapping frameworks, many of which don’t play nicely together, which you are almost blackmailed into using in order to fix problems or deal with a particular web browser, that is, if you’re not lucky enough to use something like Ext JS which takes care of all these hassles.

This past couple of weeks I’ve had to research using web components for a new project. “Keep calm and #UseThePlatform” it says on their web site. So what are they?

Web components are a set of web platform APIs that allow you to create new custom, reusable, encapsulated HTML tags to use in web pages and web apps. Custom components and widgets build on the Web Component standards, will work across modern browsers, and can be used with any JavaScript library or framework that works with HTML.

Sounds promising. Web components are not like your dime-a-dozen widget library and are supposed to be the future of user interfaces on the web. So I read some more and pretty soon it becomes clear that Polymer is probably the right way to go. Somewhere along the way I came across somebody who said that Polymer is to Web Components what jQuery is to JavaScript. It basically makes it easier to write Web Components and cuts down on all of the boilerplate code you have to write; that’s all I need to know.

The use case that I was given involves a simple web service call to search for records and display them in a grid. Easy. I’ve been doing that kind of stuff for almost two decades now, so this shouldn’t be much trouble at all. By a country mile, the only grid worth using if you want to create a custom element (another term for these things which means that I’m creating my own, reusable HTML tag, such as <my-awesome-tag>) is the one from Vaadin. This blog post is already becoming a rambling mess, so I’ll cut to the chase here and say that I couldn’t get version 2 of their grid to work with my Polymer 2 custom element, so I had to install version 3.0.0-beta1 (which works perfectly fine except that it hangs Internet Explorer 11 if you tab into the grid; I can see that beta1 has been pulled and only the 3.0.0-alpha2 version is available again, maybe because of this bug?). No biggie, they’re bound to fix it eventually which shouldn’t stop me from continuing my research.

Within a few days I created a magical web component which fired a custom event when the user selects a row (so that anybody who uses <my-awesome-tag> can add an event listener to handle it). I also set up data binding between my element and an input box which automatically sends requests to my web service whenever the query parameter changes, thereby updating the grid with new records seamlessly. Wonderful! Web Components really are the future of the web. There’s only one problem – I use Chrome as my web browser because it’s the fastest (especially when it comes to testing apps heavily dependant on JavaScript, such as Ext JS). Does it work in Internet Explorer 11?

No. All this time I had been coding away happily in a version of JavaScript that this nearly four-year-old browser does not understand. Just great! Polymer 2 uses the sixth edition of JavaScript, variously known as ECMAScript 2015 or ES6 [read this if you’re really bored]. If you want to use Polymer 2 components in IE 11 you have to transpile ES6 down to ES5 and serve up the former only to newer browsers (Firefox, Chrome, and Edge 14+) and the latter to all versions of IE and earlier versions of Edge. Yay! I get to experience the delights of browser sniffing (you could just serve the ES5 transpiled bundle to all browsers, including Chrome which supports Web Components natively, but you would need to include the custom-elements-es5-adapter.js shim, which just seems nasty; I’d rather do browser sniffing so that Chrome can fly and only IE suffers).

After getting that sorted, I turn my attention to getting this custom element to work from within an Angular app. You could do entire apps in Polymer but that would require a bit more work and Angular had already been chosen as the other framework for this new project anyway (not by me). So I start learning and find that Angular and Polymer both are projects by developers at Google with a lot of similarity, but one is playing the short game and the other a long game. Angular does its own thing whereas Polymer tries to adhere to standards (or specifications which eventually will become standards and supported by all browsers one day).

As I type this rant at home on a Friday night I’m trying to recall the arduous journey I’ve taken this week so that I can fully document the experience for everyone’s amusement. I can’t recall the finer details of the problems I had trying to get my Polymer 2 component to work with Angular 2, but my console was full of indecipherable errors and I soon realised that the two don’t play nicely together; I would need some assistance from @codebakery/origami and would have to upgrade to Angular 4. I suppose I should have started taking notes by this time because the journey was truly becoming tragic, but I couldn’t get Origami to work either, and my search for some other options came up empty handed. I decided to admit defeat and declare that I could not get Web Components to work with Angular.

If I was asked to evaluate Web Components specifically instead of any other widget library then there must have been a good reason, and my research lead me to the view that they might just be the holy grail of user interfaces on the web, so maybe Angular was the problem? I soon found this excellent summary of a talk by Rob Eisenberg comparing AngularJS, Angular 2, Aurelia, Ember, Polymer and React. Rob once worked at Google on Angular but eventually left over disagreements about the direction it was taking (and after my brief exposure, I began to see why: it’s over-engineered and would lock you in to using Angular for everything). The recommendation at the end piqued my interest in Aurelia: it doesn’t get in your way, supports web components, high performance, clean syntax (Angular 2 is just ridiculous!), standards compliant, and great if you’re a good developer.

I saw mention of Aurelia in some tech news article once but dismissed it out of hand, thinking to myself “yeah, yeah, another framework… yawn”. The Quick Start guide is probably one of the best such articles I’ve ever seen and the more detailed tutorial did not disappoint. The page describing its Technical Benefits seemed to tick all the boxes, too. I proposed to my colleagues that we should abandon Angular and use Aurelia instead, and after a little hesitation, they went along with it.

Another day, another framework to learn. Never mind, this one finally does seem like it’s worth my time, so I got stuck in and had a good time learning it. I then try to integrate my Polymer component with it and after a few issues (mainly surrounding me learning a new framework; nothing is ever easy!) it seems to play nicely enough. I was surprised that it seemed to “just work”. Great. Time to test it in Internet Explorer 11. Computer says no and I even served up the ES5 version just to keep it happy. I didn’t realise straight away that Aurelia even had a seemingly well documented article on Integrating Polymer components which I didn’t notice originally (there was a lot of stuff on the Internet, albeit slightly out of date, asking about Aurelia/Polymer integration which suggested it wasn’t officially supported yet, so that was my bad for not thoroughly browsing the docs).

My project directory already had about 120MB in my node_modules and bower_components directories from using npm and bower, but in order to get Polymer to work with Aurelia I had to also start using JSPM. This added another 50MB to my project, thank you very much! I have to call System.import(‘aurelia-bootstrapper’) after the WebComponentsReady event, but my project was created using the Aurelia CLI meaning that my app is started with a simple script tag pointing to scripts/vendor-bundle.js and wasn’t using the System.import method. My attempts to load the vendor-bundle that way didn’t work and when I tried to create a link element in vanilla JavaScript and append it to the DOM myself after the WebComponentsReady event had fired, I got a blank page in my browser and no errors at all. Well, that’s just great. Aurelia should update that Polymer integration document to explain how to kick-start your app if you’re using a production build and not the System.import quick start method.

By this stage the day was getting on and it being Friday, I thought, “enough is enough”. I don’t need this shit. Aurelia is nice and all, but I shouldn’t have to subject myself to this much torture just because Internet Explorer 11 has to be the default browser because of some shitty, over-priced, corporate application which only works if IE is set as the default browser, and of course, asking people to go into IE only for that shitty app and to use Chrome or Firefox for everything else just won’t do, now, will it?!

Sadly, this is what web development has become today:

Peter Griffin fighting with the venetian blinds

Being a web developer in 2017 and having to support Internet Explorer 11 is like a chef having to go dumpster diving for food to cook and being forced to serve it in a dog bowl.

I really don’t care any more. Let’s just use Angular for everything and be done with it. We can’t have nice things if people insist on using a web browser that’s almost four years old.

I’ve had the kind of week that only chocolate and ice cream can fix, and maybe binge watching a new TV series, too; I still haven’t watched the latest seasons of Fargo or Better Call Saul. That sounds like a plan to make everything better :-)

Coding on Apple is still a love/hate relationship

So, it’s been almost two years since I posted anything here, and it’s just over two years (almost to the day), since I last had a good whinge about XCode. It has only been laziness that has kept me from spewing much guts here about all kinds of annoyances.

So, I’ve been learning Swift for the past year, and whilst it was long overdue, it’s only the language part of the equation. The Cocoa API is still a nasty piece of work; give me the .NET Framework and C# ANY DAY (except if that means I have to use Windows at home; sorry, but I can use it at work writing web services and such like, but I’m not letting that operating system near my computer at home).

So, here’s what drove me mad about XCode/Swift/Cocoa today:

I used to have a drag/drop connection between a combobox and a class to handle the selection change event. That worked fine, however, when I modified it to also handle updating something as the user typed each letter in the combobox, the handling of selection changes failed. You can only handle one or the other when doing the drag/drop connection crap between the combobox and the IBAction.

So, I found a delegate method, which means that I modified the relevant view controller to implement the NSComboBoxDelegate protocol so that it suddenly receives all of the methods in that protocol, whether I implement them or not; the ones I care to implement actually do get called, and the others are ignored. This seems strange to a .NET programmer, and takes a bit of getting used to, but it can also be very powerful (and a time saver in some cases).

This delegate method is the comboBoxSelectionDidChange notification. Being a “did change” event you’d think that it would only call the method when I have actually finished selecting an item from the drop-down list portion of the combobox. You would be mistaken. Past tense apparently isn’t past tense in Cocoa.

Only one problem: if I use “combo.stringValue” inside that method it still returns the previous value in the text part of the combobox. If I want to get the text of the item that the user selected, I’ve got to do this:

dateCombo.itemObjectValueAtIndex(dateCombo.indexOfSelectedItem) as! String

I do not have the words to describe my disappointment.

Come on Apple, the Cocoa framework needs a decent upgrade.


Crappy Linux Twitter Clients

I’ve about had it with the range of Twitter clients on offer in Linux. Twitux seems capable of producing nothing but “Timeline Parse Error” messages these days, so I went looking for something else. Found two possibilities: gTwitter and Gwibber. Judging by the screenshots, Gwibber is a screen real-estate hog, so I don’t think I’ll bother with that. So that leaves gTwitter. More disappointment in store, it seems…

I install gTwitter and land at a preference window, which is fine. Entered what I thought were my credentials but they didn’t work. The gTwitter window says “Click on the Preferences button to enter username and password” but there is no such button. There’s a refresh, and a paint-brush icon in the “What are you doing?” text field, but no preferences button. I try right-clicking in the humungous top area where it says “Connection failed!” but nothing shows. The “Connection failed!” message is actually a button that loads a web page; no thanks. Clicking on the icon of a PC with two screens simply toggles the humungo-area between error message and a “Name:” label and nothing else. No sign of a “Preferences button” as advertised.

Turns out there’s an icon in the panel at the top of my screen that I have to right-click on to then get to a preferences menu! Grrr! Now since I paid the princely sum of $0.00 dollars for my Ubuntu setup, I don’t really have much recourse, but come on! It’s crapware like this that makes you wonder how Linux will ever win over the masses. I should have expected it, though, since gTwitter depends on Mono, which provides the .NET plague especially for Linux.

Oh, and now that I’ve just started Twitux one more time to confirm I got the error message right, the little bitch decides to work this time! Why on earth has it been such a right pain in the you-know-what for days on end now, and it’s only after I go flirting with another crappy Twitter client that it realises it has to put out to keep me? Crikey! Sometimes computers really piss me off!